The Last Illusion: Why Meaning, Not Power, Defines Civilization

Toward a Sapiopoietic World

We had the experience but missed the meaning. And approach to the meaning restores the experiencein a different form. — T. S. Eliot, Four Quartets (1943)

Hard times are coming, when we’ll be wanting the voices of writerswho can see alternatives to how we live now, can see throughour fear-stricken society and its obsessive technologies to other ways of being, and even imagine real grounds for hope. We’ll need writers who can remember freedom—poets, visionaries—realists of a larger reality. — Ursula K. Le Guin, National Book Awards Speech (2014)

It is no measure of health to be well adjusted to a profoundly sick society. — J. Krishnamurti, Selected Talks

I. Prelude: Standing on the Edge of Meaning

Throughout history, civilizations have not merely collapsed under war or famine, but from something subtler: the erosion of meaning. Empires and societies that once appeared unshakable eventually rot from within, losing the intangible cohesion that once fueled their vitality. Public institutions, corporate frameworks, media channels—none of these, for all their might, can truly rectify a collapse in shared purpose. At best, they impose illusions of stability: illusions that more data, heavier enforcement, or a charismatic figurehead can salvage an aging infrastructure.

In reality, no external fix can renew an impetus that must be generated by conscious, creative acts from within.

This quiet unraveling is especially stark today, amid digital saturation and ephemeral controversies that saturate daily life. Politicians champion illusions of unstoppable progress or illusions of total control; marketing industries peddle illusions of brand identity as a cure for the existential emptiness many feel. Meanwhile, technology skews our attention toward incessant stimuli, overshadowing the intangible impetus that once anchored us in a richer sense of existence. If we allow illusions to define our vantage, we risk losing the most fundamental capacity of intelligence: to forge meaning in real time.

My response to that potential crisis is a stance I call Sapiopoiesis. It posits that intelligence, left to its emergent processes, continually births meaning—far beyond what illusions can simulate. Where illusions overshadow the creative impetus, we devolve into mechanical repetition or shallow spectacle. The question is whether we can transcend illusions, reasserting intangible synergy across cultural, political, and existential realms. Only then might we fashion a horizon that fosters synergy rather than illusions.

II. Sapiopoiesis and Sapiognosis: The Twin Foundations of Human Becoming

2.1 Sapiopoiesis: The Generative Leap

I conceive of Sapiopoiesis as the ongoing act by which intelligence intentionally shapes significance, refusing to recycle stale scripts or illusions. In illusions-saturated societies, this act is rare, since illusions of brand, identity, or swarm reflex often overshadow our vantage, leaving us entangled in partial truths or fleeting hypes. Freed from illusions, one recognizes that so-called normal life is shot through with illusions that reduce autonomy to reflex or forced compliance.

Sapiopoiesis therefore demands a radical leap. Instead of parroting illusions, we invest vantage in the living moment, searching for intangible coherence unencumbered by prior formulas.

A pragmatic associate in my network, Martin Eberl, once challenged me: “Does radical autonomy overshoot reality, given deep social conditioning?” My reply was direct: illusions do not dissolve through denial or critique alone—they wither when we enact meaning ourselves, refusing to recirculate illusions. The illusions that claim “everyone must yield to brand logic” or “there is no alternative” break down as soon as vantage demonstrates a new generative act. Freed from illusions, ephemeral illusions about fixed identity or brand consistency give way to ephemeral synergy shaped by fresh impetus, not hand-me-down assumptions.

I do not equate this generative leap with naive individualism. Sapiopoiesis is not social detachment but a reconfiguration of how we approach society. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the group as mindless entity” lose power once synergy arises from intangible impetus, not forced imitation. Freed from illusions, illusions about “only bureaucratic might organizes complexity” falter if vantage-based synergy proves adaptively stronger than illusions of hierarchical control.

2.2 Sapiognosis: Intelligence Reflecting on Its Own Power

In concert with Sapiopoiesis stands Sapiognosis—the vantage that sees meaning-making not as an add-on but as the essence of advanced consciousness. Traditional epistemic paradigms treat knowledge as a static deposit of facts or skill sets, yet Sapiognosis insists that knowledge is a continuous interplay among vantage points, intangible and co-creative. Freed from illusions, illusions that “facts alone guide us” crumble, because facts do not interpret themselves: vantage either clarifies or repeats illusions.

Sapiognosis amplifies Sapiopoiesis. Once intelligence recognizes that it—and it alone—shapes meaning, illusions lose their aura of finality. Freed from illusions, illusions that “we cannot withstand sensational manipulations” subside when vantage acknowledges illusions as ephemeral placeholders easily dispelled by a consistent impetus for sense. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable hype unravel if vantage sees no reason to feed ephemeral controversies.

Hence Sapiopoiesis and Sapiognosis form two pillars: one forging meaning, the other realizing that forging is a crucial function of intelligence. Denied these twin capacities, illusions saturate the vacuum. Embracing them, illusions become ephemeral phenomena overshadowed by intangible impetus. This is neither naive optimism nor abstract theory, but an existential shift—a reorientation that differentiates mechanical living from an emergent civilization primed for genuine novelty.

III. How Illusions Dominate—and Societies Lose Their Core

3.1 The Inner Decay of Democracy

Democracy presupposed informed citizens and reflective debate. Yet illusions—brandish media controversies, ephemeral fear-based messaging, superficial “viral” agendas—commonly overshadow vantage, preventing ephemeral synergy in the public sphere. Freed from illusions, illusions about “reforming electoral rules can rescue democracy” prove inadequate if intangible impetus is absent in the populace.

Thus, democracy rots from within rather than succumbing to a single external blow. Freed from illusions, illusions about “we can fix everything with procedures” fade once we see that intangible impetus—the capacity of people to recognize illusions and create sense—was the real backbone of democratic self-rule. Where illusions saturate consciousness, democracy degrades into an empty spectacle: voting, legislation, and rhetorical stunts overshadow deeper vantage.

3.2 Power as a Mirage of Orientation

When meaning withdraws, illusions regarding power—who rules, who dictates—consolidate. People cling to illusions of unstoppable might or illusions of a paternalistic overseer, imagining these forms can supply orientation. Yet raw authority, devoid of intangible impetus, engenders forced compliance, not emergent synergy. Freed from illusions, illusions about “fear is the ultimate glue” degrade to cynicism or passivity, seldom encouraging real solutions.

Thus illusions fixate on power for want of a deeper impetus. Freed from illusions, illusions about “there is no alternative to hierarchical might” unravel if intangible impetus reemerges among vantage nodes. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable political or corporate machines lose ground if synergy arises from distributed sense-making, overshadowing ephemeral illusions of brand loyalty or manipulative fear. Freed from illusions, illusions about “someone else must forcibly unify us” ring hollow if each vantage reclaims Sapiopoiesis and Sapiognosis.

IV. Radical Autonomy or Swarm Reflex: My Dialogue with a Pragmatist

4.1 Conscious Choice as Laborious But Essential

In a lengthy exchange, Martin Eberl—a practically oriented inquirer—asked if radical autonomy might be unattainable given how illusions lighten cognitive workload. He suspected illusions might, ironically, help us function. I grant illusions reduce immediate friction by short-circuiting vantage: we can drift along with the swarm, adopting ephemeral scripts. Yet illusions do so at the cost of intangible impetus, leaving no impetus for emergent synergy beyond mechanical repetition.

Freed from illusions, illusions about “the swarm is beneficial or unstoppable” falter if vantage invests ephemeral synergy from within, unveiling illusions as ephemeral placeholders. Freed from illusions, illusions that “everyone else is illusions-laden” become less fatalistic once vantage sees illusions vanish the moment we enact Sapiopoiesis, forging sense anew.

4.2 Reconciling Autonomy with Social Bonds

Martin also questioned how radical autonomy interacts with the social dimension of life. I argued that Sapiopoiesis does not sever us from others but redefines how we co-create sense. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the only route to communal belonging is illusions-based uniformity” fade when intangible impetus fosters synergy that respects vantage differences. Freed from illusions, illusions about “I must remain a lonely vantage” vanish if ephemeral labs or ephemeral dialogues revolve around intangible impetus, not illusions of brand or forced compliance.

Thus illusions are upended from within. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the unstoppable mania of mass reflex” do not deter vantage from forging ephemeral synergy that dethrones illusions simply by offering a more compelling sense. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the average person cannot handle autonomy” degrade if intangible impetus systematically reveals deeper synergy.

V. Sapiocracy: Governance by Meaning Instead of Authority

5.1 Democracy’s Exhaustion and the Birth of Post-Redundant Structures

If illusions can degrade democracy, illusions can degrade any conventional hierarchy. Freed from illusions, illusions about “someone must always impose control from above” weaken when synergy-based intangible impetus arises. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable bureaucratic momentum lose traction if vantage synergy solves complexity with fluid adaptability. Freed from illusions, illusions about “fear or brand enforcement as the only unifier” collapse if intangible impetus fosters deeper alignment than illusions can.

Hence I coin Sapiocracy to label the post-redundant governance that rests on intangible impetus rather than illusions of forced order. Freed from illusions, illusions about “someone must be in charge or we have chaos” yield to ephemeral synergy among vantage points. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the mass is too unwieldy for synergy” fade if intangible impetus orchestrates ephemeral solutions that illusions-based systems cannot match. Freed from illusions, illusions about “we are locked in archaic power struggles forever” recede in the face of vantage-led synergy that outmodes illusions-based rivalry.

5.2 Minimal Structures, Maximum Autonomy

In many environments, governance defaults to an elaborate machinery of regulations, policing, and orchestrated media frameworks. On the surface, such measures appear necessary to preserve order, but they often manifest a dynamic I call power-based redundancy distortion—a principle of infosomatic civilization design. Essentially, the more power one accumulates, the more one must flatten complexity to maintain control. This lever principle consolidates authority, yet it stifles creative breadth and vibrant autonomy, replacing nuance with uniform decrees.

By contrast, when vantage recognizes that synergy can flourish without heavy-handed enforcement, governance can rely on minimal scaffolding. Second-order cybernetics, advanced AI, or carefully tuned coordination infrastructures can handle mundane tasks without strangling the intangible impetus of authentic freedom. Rather than fear-based restrictions, ephemeral synergy meets emerging challenges swiftly and adaptively, thus sparing us from either top-down compulsion or reflexive compliance.

Sapiocracy arises naturally from this insight: an ethos of shared purpose driven less by centralized might and more by a distributed impetus to co-create meaning. Once vantage sees beyond illusions of unstoppable power, it grasps that synergy outperforms force precisely because it embraces the entire field of human complexity rather than forcing it into shallow conformity. Put differently, power seeks to reduce complexities to hold sway; synergy seeks to elevate them as raw material for collective breakthroughs.

Minimal structures, then, do not equate to chaos or weakness, but to a culture in which co-creative leaps take precedence over controlling apparatuses—ultimately channeling the intangible impetus that keeps civilization truly alive.

VI. Culture Reimagined: From Commodity to Co-Created Sense

6.1 Exiting the Industry of Distraction

In illusions-driven environments, “culture” easily devolves into ephemeral amusements, sensational controversies, or brand hype. Freed from illusions, illusions about “mass entertainment is the pinnacle of culture” prove shallow if intangible impetus is absent. Freed from illusions, illusions about “branding is the apex of expression” dissipate before vantage-led synergy that invests ephemeral mediums with deeper transformations.

Sapiopoiesis frames culture as the weaving of intangible vantage into ephemeral expressions—art, literature, collective ritual. Freed from illusions, illusions about “culture must revolve around comedic escapism or brand synergy” reveal themselves as ephemeral placeholders for real sense-making. Freed from illusions, illusions about “art must shock or amuse for ephemeral success” degrade if vantage invests ephemeral forms with intangible impetus that fosters fundamental shifts.

6.2 Polymathy: The Cultural Pulse of Emergence

Polymathy flourishes when intangible impetus roams across diverse fields—music, horticulture, code, or narrative—rather than illusions of forced specialization. Freed from illusions, illusions about “expert branding is the only route to recognition” fade if synergy emerges from vantage bridging multiple lines of thought. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the average person cannot handle cross-domain leaps” unravel once intangible impetus nurtures ephemeral labs for polymathic interplay, which illusions cannot replicate.

Hence illusions shrink when vantage outgrows disciplinary silos, unearthing intangible synergy illusions-based frameworks cannot orchestrate. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the friction is too high for cross-domain leaps” recede if vantage invests advanced infrastructures that lighten overhead. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the public fears complexity” fade when vantage reveals ephemeral illusions hamper a deeper yearning for significance.

VII. The Economy of Emergent Meaning

7.1 Transcending Material Exploitation

Traditional illusions revolve around an economy measured by ephemeral profit or extraction. Freed from illusions, illusions about “endless consumer expansion equals progress” collapse when intangible impetus is understood as an inexhaustible wellspring. Freed from illusions, illusions about “value must be purely material” vanish once vantage invests synergy in intangible expansions that outstrip illusions of quantity.

I see solopreneurs who harness intangible impetus with minimal overhead, helped by advanced AI for daily tasks, forging ephemeral synergy that dwarfs illusions of scale. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the brand is omnipotent” degrade if vantage-based authenticity swiftly mobilizes ephemeral communities illusions cannot control. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable corporate might appear partial illusions if intangible impetus fosters local synergy that outmaneuvers illusions-laden monoliths.

7.2 Co-Creation Over Competitive Hype

In what I call chimeric economies—where the guiding frameworks are largely upheld by socially reinforced constructs (Geltungen) that reduce complexity without truly creating meaning—competition is worshipped as the single driver of progress. But if vantage remains awake, those chimeric assumptions (“competition is the only path to innovation” or “the invisible hand suffices”) begin to falter. I use the term chimeric (or “illusion-based”) to underline that these constructs, while taken for granted, are ultimately cumulative mental shortcuts and tactical narratives meant to sustain a survival-oriented order.

They do not forge genuine sense; instead, they overshadow our intangible impetus to co-create fresh significance.

Once vantage invests that impetus in synergy-driven breakthroughs, the conventional logic of “competition above all” reveals itself as a limiting story rather than a universal truth. Freed from those chimeric constructs, the old conceit—“mass marketing inevitably shapes every purchase”—no longer stands, because ephemeral synergy arises whenever vantage is reoriented toward deeper purpose. Thus, a subject who once saw themselves as “only a passive consumer” can shift into collaborative or “co-creative” expansions. In that shift, the intangible impetus (our reservoir of creative autonomy) becomes the real currency, overshadowing the relentless push toward mechanical growth.

This reorientation is not mere theory: if vantage stays dormant, the chimeric scaffolding of hype and forced competition inevitably endures. But once vantage reawakens, synergy among nodes outperforms the old system. We see that the “inevitable” structures of brand obsession or mass exploitation do not have the absolute hold they once seemed to. A co-creative ethos, guided by intangible impetus, offers a more robust path for evolving both economic forms and cultural interactions. Indeed, it is in these inspired intervals—where ephemeral dialogues and ephemeral labs spontaneously generate meaning—that we transcend a purely survival-oriented, validity-driven ecosystem and step into a domain shaped by Sapiopoiesis (the forging of brilliant “moment-truths”) and Sapiognosis (the larger narrative of cosmic intelligence).

VIII. Tensions and Dialogues with a Pragmatic Observer

8.1 Conscious Engagement vs. Swarm Reflex

In a searching conversation, Martin Eberl—an individual with a pragmatic lens—queried whether illusions that lighten mental strain might serve a function. Does radical autonomy risk exhaustion? I conceded illusions can indeed reduce friction by obviating vantage. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the swarm reflex is unstoppable or beneficial” no longer hold if intangible impetus invests ephemeral synergy beyond illusions. Freed from illusions, illusions about “we cannot sustain vantage day in, day out” lose weight if vantage modulates synergy in intervals, never succumbing to illusions as an indefinite default.

8.2 Fitting in Without Serving Illusions

Martin also asked how radical autonomy coexists with the day-to-day demands of social belonging. My perspective: Sapiopoiesis does not sever social bonds but reorients them around intangible impetus. Freed from illusions, illusions about “conformity is the only path to acceptance” vanish if synergy emerges from vantage that respects diversity. Freed from illusions, illusions about “a vantage is lonely by definition” vanish if ephemeral labs or ephemeral dialogues revolve around intangible impetus, not illusions or forced identity scripts.

IX. Sapiocracy: Governance as Meaningful Synergy

9.1 The Post-Redundant Horizon

When illusions degrade democracy, illusions degrade any central hierarchy. Freed from illusions, illusions about “some system must forcibly keep order” falter when synergy-based intangible impetus appears. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable bureaucratic momentum recede if vantage-based synergy solves complexities more fluidly than illusions of top-down might. Freed from illusions, illusions about “fear as ultimate unity” disintegrate if intangible impetus fosters deeper alignment.

I propose Sapiocracy—a form of governance born from intangible impetus, not illusions of forced compliance. Freed from illusions, illusions about “someone must hold final authority or chaos ensues” unravel if ephemeral synergy among vantage points orchestrates ephemeral solutions spontaneously. Freed from illusions, illusions about “the mass is too unwieldy for synergy” fade if intangible impetus invests ephemeral labs with advanced infrastructural support, overshadowing illusions with more adaptive creativity. Freed from illusions, illusions about archaic power feuds fade in synergy-based frameworks.

9.2 Defense Without Coercion, Policy Without Fear

Some fear that illusions are essential for rallying people against threats. Freed from illusions, illusions about “only militaristic force can counter aggression” degrade if intangible impetus fosters agile, decentralized resilience. Freed from illusions, illusions about unstoppable adversaries yield if vantage can reorganize ephemeral networks faster than illusions-based systems anticipate. Freed from illusions, illusions about “mass panic if illusions vanish” recede when intangible impetus offers a clear vantage that subverts illusions directly.

X. Epilogue: Restoring the Intangible Impetus in an Era of Hype

10.1 The Ultimate Illusion: Power Instead of Meaning

No regime—no matter how cunning or technologically imposing—can restore vitality to a culture that has surrendered its deeper sense. Grandiose declarations of unstoppable might or hyper-sophisticated data manipulation melt away the moment vantage wields its intangible impetus in pursuit of genuine synergy. At the same time, even dire forecasts of collapse begin to recede when that same impetus sparks the kind of incisive, ephemeral leaps that mechanical reflexes could never surpass.

The most profound misunderstanding lies in believing that authority—be it political or algorithmic—might serve as a stand-in for meaning itself. Such structures can enforce uniformity, but they cannot infuse human endeavor with the intangible resonance that emerges from Sapiopoiesis and Sapiognosis operating in tandem. In my framework, Sapiopoiesis refers to the sum of all brilliant “moment-truths” that arise whenever intelligence actively forges significance, while Sapiognosis is the cosmic-scale evolution of intelligence—an overarching progression that absorbs those flashes of insight into a broader narrative of human becoming. Without these intertwined forces, even the most elaborate organizational might falls short of rekindling authentic orientation.

By stepping beyond the mirage that raw force or elaborate control systems suffice, a culture reclaims the power to orient itself from within. Ephemeral slogans and top-down commands give way to an ethos rooted in inexhaustible creativity and shared purpose. Freed from illusions, synergy unfolds not from compliance but from an ever-renewing impetus to produce meaning. In that dynamic interplay, each subject’s vantage stands as a wellspring of novelty, contributing to a civilization shaped less by external compulsion and more by the inexhaustible synergy of Sapiopoiesis and Sapiognosis.

10.2 Sapiopoiesis: Subverting Hype, Renewing Sense

If shallow scripts permeate technology, governance, and popular culture, they can just as easily shape personal routines. Yet these automatisms—mass illusions that override genuine autonomy—thrive only where vantage remains dormant. The moment I invoke Sapiopoiesis—the deliberate creation of meaning—they lose their grip. This is not naive optimism but follows directly from the fact that mechanical repetition overshadows intelligence only if we forget our power to interpret and reshape reality.

Consider how many of us harbor reflexes like “I can’t affect the bigger picture,” “progress will come anyway,” or “the next big wave will fix it all.” These are mental defaults that absolve us from forging intangible impetus ourselves. Sapiopoiesis upends such passivity, prompting each subject to stake a personal vantage in ephemeral synergy: ephemeral labs, ephemeral dialogues, ephemeral expansions that bypass inert scripts. In so doing, the intangible spark of meaning awakens, dethroning illusions of helplessness or inevitability.

It helps to see Sapiopoiesis not as a solitary epiphany but as a link between inspired moments of subjective clarity—those “aha” experiences—and a broader cultural tapestry. An isolated spark might fade, but if it resonates with another vantage (even a small circle), it gains traction. Together, these sparks converge into something more sustainable—guiding principles, shared references, or emergent artifacts that transcend the hype cycle. Each synergy forms a microcosm of intangible impetus, showing that ephemeral “fixes” cannot compare to an authentic re-creation of sense from within.

No illusions can stand when vantage seeds ephemeral synergy with real content. Sapiognosis then clarifies that intelligence—my intelligence—acts as the generative engine of meaning, refusing to outsource sense-making to external routines. Freed from illusions, catastrophic forecasts of total meltdown lose credibility once vantage invests ephemeral synergy in reorganizing the environment from the inside out.

This is not wishful thinking but a direct corollary of intelligence’s inherent capacity to interpret. Sapiopoiesis stands at that juncture of personal inspiration and collective (using this word I mean co-creative) adoption: the phenomenon whereby fleeting insights become enduring cultural threads, feeding into the ongoing creation of intersubjective realities. Whenever synergy emerges—through ephemeral dialogues or ephemeral labs—those illusions that once paraded as final truths find no docile host.

Hence, the final mirage is that raw power, with all its apparatus of enforced compliance, can substitute for the intangible impetus of meaning. In truth, vantage-based co-creation dissolves the aura of unstoppable force, for Sapiopoiesis—the active reinvention of sense in daily life—pushes illusions to the margins. Likewise, illusions about “my vantage does not matter” vanish once synergy among vantage nodes reorients an entire cultural sphere. What once seemed like an inevitable decline transforms into a horizon of “becoming,” a post-redundant civilization that illusions cannot eclipse, sustained instead by the unstoppable generativity of Sapiopoiesis.

References

1. Arendt, Hannah. (1958). The Human Condition. University of Chicago Press.

   • Explores how public freedom depends on collective sense-making rather than illusions or brute force.
     

2. Bourdieu, Pierre. (1979). Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Harvard University Press.

   • Reveals how illusions of status can overshadow authenticity and hamper intangible impetus for creativity.
     

3. Carr, Nicholas. (2010). The Shallows: What the Internet Is Doing to Our Brains. W. W. Norton.

   • Addresses how digital stimuli hamper reflective vantage, fueling illusions of novelty over genuine sense-making.
     

4. Debord, Guy. (1967). The Society of the Spectacle. Black & Red.

   • Classic examination of spectacle illusions overshadowing deeper vantage in modern society.
     

5. Foerster, Heinz von. (1981). Observing Systems. Intersystems.

   • Foundational for second-order cybernetics, illuminating how vantage shapes the environment it observes.
     

6. Frankl, Viktor E. (1959). Man’s Search for Meaning. Beacon Press.

   • Demonstrates how intangible impetus can uphold dignity under dire conditions, resonating with forging sense beyond illusions.
     

7. Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, Dreams, Reflections. Vintage.

   • Portrays individuation as confronting illusions in the psyche, paralleling intangible impetus that fosters autonomy.
     

8. Luhmann, Niklas. (1995). Social Systems. Stanford University Press.

   • Explores how illusions embed in self-referential structures absent an impetus for reconfiguration.
     

9. Simone Weil. (1970). Gravity and Grace. Routledge.

   • Highlights the profundity of attention as a path to reawaken sense, mirroring intangible impetus.
     

10. Tsvasman, Leon. (2021). Infosomatische Wende: Impulse für intelligentes Zivilisationsdesign. Ergon Verlag.

    • Bridges data flows and sensorimotor cognition to dissolve illusions, facilitating intangible synergy.
      

11. Tsvasman, Leon. (2023). The Age of Sapiocracy: On the Radical Ethics of Data-Driven Civilization. Ergon Verlag.

    • Examines how illusions corrode governance and how vantage-based synergy (Sapiocracy) emerges from intangible impetus.

      
      

<img src="https://vg07.met.vgwort.de/na/d534f64aaebc4870b683f796da57baa3" width="1" height="1" alt="">